As of January 7, 2022, simply over a yr into the marketing campaign to inject each human being with a gene switch product to guard in opposition to COVID, the U.S. Vaccine Adversarial Occasions Reporting System (VAERS) has acquired 9,936 experiences of demise following the COVID jab in the US’ territories alone.1 Once you embody overseas experiences acquired by VAERS, the demise toll stands at 21,745.
A complete of 1,541 miscarriages have additionally been reported post-jab within the U.S., or 3,594 if you happen to embody overseas experiences. Regardless of these surprising statistics, U.S. well being officers and “reality checkers” insist not a single demise will be attributed to the photographs.
Throughout an early January 2022 Senate committee listening to on the nation’s Omicron response (see video above), Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, and director for the Nationwide Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Ailments, Dr. Anthony Fauci, testified — underneath oath — that they “didn’t know” what number of deaths had been reported to VAERS following COVID “vaccination.”2,3
Walensky referred to the photographs as “extremely protected,” claiming — in opposition to all science — that they “defend us in opposition to Omicron, they defend us in opposition to Delta, they defend us in opposition to COVID.” She additionally falsely claimed that each one reported COVID-19 vaccine deaths have been “adjudicated.”
No, VAERS Is Not a Repository of Faux Stories
Worse but, each Walensky and Fauci declare any and all hostile occasions following vaccination get reported to VAERS, together with unintentional deaths and automobile accidents. They each truly declare that if an individual will get the COVID shot and will get hit by a automobile afterward, that’s reported as an hostile response.
Nothing may very well be farther from the reality. To start with, hostile occasions usually are not robotically reported and, definitely, apparent accidents usually are not entered into the system as a suspected vaccine facet impact.
As reported by Well being Affect Information,4 there are about 18 experiences in VAERS that embody “street site visitors accident,” however most if not all relate to an hostile occasion, reminiscent of a coronary heart assault, occurring whereas driving. They weren’t hit by another person and entered into the system. As famous by Pam Lengthy in a January 12, 2022, Twitter thread:5
“If anybody in public well being utters ‘an individual can get hit by a automobile & report their demise to VAERS’ you want cease them, in any public assembly, and demand they clarify what motive would a doctor must inflate VAERS experiences with automobile accidents or any unrelated mortality?
Regardless of Walensky’s & Fauci’s cliché testimony to Congress. Not one particular person ‘bought hit by a automobile’ & reported their very own demise to VAERS as a vaccine damage. Most experiences are filed by medical professionals, utilizing diagnostic language about drug reactions.”
VAERS was designed and created as an early warning system. It’s true that anybody can file a report, nevertheless it’s time-consuming, requires the information of medical particulars a affected person oftentimes gained’t have, and carries penalties for submitting a false report. There’s completely no purpose to suspect, not to mention assume, that individuals are submitting false experiences simply to make the photographs look unhealthy.
Truth Checker Outs Himself as a Pharma Propagandist
Walensky and Fauci aren’t the one ones mendacity in regards to the lethality of the COVID jab. Mainstream media are all-in as effectively. In a USA At present reality verify,6 Daniel Funke claims that “COVID-19 vaccines [are] protected for youngsters” and “not linked to deaths.”
“… on-line, some declare youngsters face extra threat from the vaccine than COVID-19 itself,” Funke writes. “USA TODAY beforehand rated False a declare that youngsters are 50 instances extra more likely to die from the COVID-19 vaccine than the virus. This declare is equally incorrect.
Public well being officers say the vaccine from Pfizer-BioNTech is protected and efficient at stopping COVID-19 in youngsters ages 5-11. As different impartial fact-checking organizations have reported, the advantages of the vaccine outweigh its recognized and potential dangers.
‘Over 700 youngsters have died because of COVID-19 in the US,’ Dr. Sonja Rasmussen, a professor within the departments of pediatrics and epidemiology on the College of Florida, stated in an e mail.
‘I’m not conscious of any deaths in youngsters which were attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine’ … The advantages of the COVID-19 vaccine for youngsters outweigh its recognized and potential dangers, in accordance with the CDC. The shot doesn’t trigger demise.”
Funke cites knowledge from Pfizer’s medical trials, “which discovered the vaccine was protected” for youngsters, as “no deaths have been reported” in Pfizer’s trials for 12- to 25-year-olds, and people for 12- to 17-year-olds. Funke dismisses the rationale for taking a look at VAERS knowledge on the idea that anybody can file a report and that experiences are unverified, and due to this fact can’t be used to find out causation.
All Opinion and No Information
There are such a lot of points with this “fact-check,” no surprise Fb attorneys are utilizing the authorized protection that reality checks are “opinion” solely and never precise assertions of reality.7,8 There’s nothing however opinions on this piece. As “proof” that the COVID photographs are protected and have prompted no deaths, Funke presents:
One other opinion piece by USA At present
The supposed opinion of unnamed “public well being officers”
Biased opinion assertions by different pharma-funded propaganda organizations (aka, “reality checking organizations”)
The opinion of a single professor who admits she is unaware of publicly obtainable knowledge
The unsupported opinion of the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention, a captured company that has repeatedly been caught manipulating knowledge and altering definitions to suit the pandemic narrative
Pfizer’s preliminary trial knowledge, which whistleblowers warn could have integrity points9
The unsupported declare that VAERS knowledge are unreliable as a result of anybody can file, the implication being that individuals can file faux experiences
The debatable declare that VAERS knowledge can not inform us something about causation, therefore it’s ineffective taking a look at it
It’s onerous to give you a much less compelling record of evidences for security, however then once more, propagandists must work with what they’ve, and on this case, they don’t have anything. Funke presents zero precise knowledge to help his opinion.
Clarify the Rise in Mortality if You Can
There are various data-driven causes to suspect, predict and even assume that the COVID photographs are killing extra individuals than they’re saving — whatever the age group in query. It could take a complete guide to cowl all of it, so I’ll solely evaluate a couple of of these causes right here.
One very telling clue that lately got here to mild is life insurance coverage knowledge. In response to OneAmerica, a nationwide life insurance coverage firm based mostly in Indianapolis, within the third quarter of 2021, working-age People (aged 18 to 64) died at a price that’s 40% increased than the prepandemic price, and so they didn’t die from COVID.10
And, in accordance with CEO Scott Davidson, this catastrophic abnormality is constantly seen “throughout each participant” within the life insurance coverage business.11 A 40% improve in mortality is solely extraordinary, and as of but, they declare to haven’t any clue as to what’s inflicting younger and middle-aged individuals to die prematurely at such an astounding price.
Taking a look at it from a sleuth’s perspective, one would possibly ask, “What environmental issue with unknown security was launched in 2021 to individuals on this age group?” Certain, pandemic restrictions have led to spikes in drug overdoses and suicides, which impacts this cohort particularly. However “deaths of desperation” can not account for all of it.
The one wild card is the COVID jab. Greater than 173 million working-age People (18 to 64) bought these experimental gene switch injections,12 and medical doctors and scientists have elucidated a number of mechanisms by which they may injure or kill.
What’s extra, the rise in deaths started AFTER the rollout of the photographs, and regardless of the causative issue, it isn’t solely nationwide however seemingly worldwide in scope. The Insurance coverage Regulatory and Improvement Authority of India, for instance, additionally experiences a 41% rise in demise claims in 2021.13
Extra deaths (exceeding prepandemic norms) are additionally reported within the U.Ok.14 Amongst teenagers (aged 15 to 19), mortality spiked proper after teenagers grew to become eligible for the COVID shot.15 Between the week ending June 26 and the week ending September 18, 2020, and that very same time period in 2021, teenage deaths rose by 47%.16
An increase in incapacity claims17 additionally means that many who aren’t killed by this novel deadly risk are significantly injured, usually long-term. For all of those causes, the COVID jabs can’t be taken off the desk. Logic calls for that they be regarded into as a possible causative issue.
Can VAERS Information Display Causality?
One one that has taken a powerful stance in opposition to the declare that VAERS knowledge can not inform us something about causation is Steve Kirsch, govt director of the COVID-19 Early Therapy Fund. Within the video “Vaccine Secrets and techniques: COVID Disaster,”18 he argues that VAERS can certainly be used to find out causality.
It’s necessary to appreciate that the concept that VAERS can not present causality is a part of how and why the CDC can declare not one of the deaths is attributable to the COVID shot. Kirsch argues that this premise is in reality false, and that causation will be decided utilizing VAERS’ knowledge.
To show his level, Kirsch offers the next analogy: Suppose you give a two-dose vaccine. After the primary dose, nothing occurs, however after the second dose, individuals die inside 24 hours of a deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
Once you have a look at the VAERS knowledge, what you’ll discover is not any experiences related to the primary dose, and a rash of deaths after the second dose, all inside the similar timeframe and with the identical explanation for demise.
In response to the CDC, you can not ascribe any causality in any respect from that. To them, it’s simply random likelihood that everybody died after the second dose, and from the identical situation, and never the primary dose or from one other situation.
Kirsch argues that causality can certainly be recognized from this sort of knowledge. It’s very tough to give you one other rationalization for why individuals — many who’re younger, in good well being with no predisposing circumstances — die precisely 24 hours after their second dose. It’s even tough to give you one other rationalization for individuals who do have underlying circumstances.
For instance, is it cheap to imagine that individuals with, say, undiagnosed coronary heart circumstances, would die from DVT precisely 24 hours after getting a second dose of vaccine? Or that individuals with undiagnosed diabetes would die from DVT precisely 24 hours after their second dose?
Why not after the primary dose, or two months after the second dose, or every other random variety of hours or days, or for different random explanation for demise? Why would individuals randomly die of the identical situation at the very same time, again and again?
At naked minimal, as an early warning system, VAERS is designed to flag potential causation. It’s by on the lookout for repeated patterns of negative effects that you’d start to establish a doubtlessly problematic vaccine. As soon as a sample is recognized — and there’s no denying demise inside 24 hours to 1 week is a sample seen for the COVID photographs — an investigation must be launched.
However no such investigation has been launched for the COVID jabs. Clear-cut patterns are merely ignored. As an early warning system, VAERS is performing as meant, regardless of extreme underreporting (the CDC lately printed a paper through which they admit COVID jab hostile results in youngsters are underreported by an element of 6.519). It’s the follow-up that’s missing. However lack of investigation and follow-up will not be proof that the photographs can’t trigger demise.
‘Unhealthy Batches’ Are One other Clue
One other clue that hints at SOME of the photographs with the ability to trigger fast demise is the “unhealthy batch” phenomenon. Impartial investigations have revealed that some plenty of the photographs are related to very extreme negative effects and demise, whereas different tons haven’t any hostile occasions related to their use.
In response to howbadismybatch.com, a website that matches up vaccine lot codes with experiences within the VAERS system, roughly 5% of the tons are liable for 90% of all hostile reactions. A few of these batches have 50 instances the variety of deaths and disabilities related to them, in comparison with different tons.20
One other web site that principally does the identical factor is TheEagle’s VAERS Dashboard. (A video explaining learn how to use the dashboard will be discovered on Bitchute.21)
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, cofounder of the German Corona Investigative Committee, and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a former member of the German parliament, focus on this “smoking gun” proof within the video above. In response to Fuellmich and Wodarg, this lot-dependent knowledge exhibits vaccine makers are conducting secret experiments inside the bigger public trial.
They seem to really be doing lethal-dose testing on the general public. Wodarg argues that the proof for that is very clear from the information. In addition they look like coordinating these lethal-dose experiments, in order that they’re not all releasing their most poisonous tons on the similar time, or in the identical areas, in order to keep away from detection via clustering.
Extra Information Exhibiting COVID Jabs Can Kill
In closing, I’ll increase simply two extra items of proof that speaks to COVID jabs being able to kill massive numbers of individuals:
• A latest histopathologic evaluation of the organs from 15 sufferers who died inside seven days to 6 months’ post-jab, ages 28 to 95, discovered 14 of the deaths — 93% — have been attributable to the jab.22,23 Not one of the authentic coroners’ experiences implicated the photographs, nevertheless.
The affiliation was solely established via post-mortem, which revealed a “technique of immunological self-attack” that’s “with out precedent.” “As a result of vaccination was the one widespread denominator between all circumstances, there will be little question that it was the set off of self-destruction in these deceased people,” Drs. Sucharit Bhakdi and Arne Burkhardt wrote.
• In response to researchers at Columbia College, the true variety of individuals killed by the COVID jabs is about 20 instances the reported price, based mostly on their evaluation of two publicly obtainable databases (VAERS within the U.S., and one other in Europe).24,25,26 That evaluation was printed in October 2021, however few ever heard a peep about it. In response to the authors:
“Evaluating our age-stratified VFRs [vaccine-induced fatality rates] with printed age-stratified coronavirus an infection fatality charges (IFR) suggests the dangers of COVID vaccines and boosters outweigh the advantages in youngsters, younger adults and older adults with low occupational threat or earlier coronavirus publicity.
We focus on implications for public well being insurance policies associated to boosters, college and office mandates, and the pressing have to establish, develop and disseminate diagnostics and coverings for life-altering vaccine accidents.”
Based mostly on the ever-mounting knowledge, the declare that COVID photographs haven’t, can not, and/or won’t trigger demise merely isn’t credible. And the longer these photographs proceed for use, the larger the probability that they may certainly kill excess of the precise virus ever did. We additionally have to keep in mind that the disabilities and long-term persistent ailing well being these photographs are inflicting will prematurely kill many extra, even when it takes 10 or 15 years, and we now have no knowledge on any of that but.